Back to News
Lawmakers want to ban AI companies from selling your health data
General AIMonday, June 29, 2026 at 05:00 PM

Lawmakers want to ban AI companies from selling your health data

Source: The Verge AI
Curated Summary

Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Mary Gay Scanlon are introducing a revamped Health and Location Data Protection Act to protect Americans' health data in the AI era.

The legislation aims to ban the sale of health and location information to data brokers, including data shared with AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude.

This bill expands on previous versions by specifically covering data entered into AI systems, addressing concerns about AI labs collecting sensitive information.

The proposal includes provisions for FTC enforcement, allowing individuals and state attorneys general to sue violators, and earmarks $1 billion for enforcement over 10 years.

The timing is significant as major AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI have launched healthcare-focused products encouraging users to upload medical records.

This legislation responds to growing concerns about data privacy and potential exploitation of sensitive health information by data brokers.

Want the full story?

Read Original Article

via The Verge AI

#privacy#legislation#healthcare#data-brokers#ftc

Related Articles

The “Father of the Internet” is finally retiring
TechCrunch AI
General AI3d ago

The “Father of the Internet” is finally retiring

Vinton Cerf, widely recognized as the father of the internet, is retiring from his role as Google’s chief internet evangelist after more than two decades. The announcement was made during a panel at the Open Frontier conference, where Cerf was honored for his foundational work on TCP/IP protocols. While stepping down, Cerf shared insights on the future of technology, specifically focusing on the rise of AI agents. He argued that autonomous AI agents will necessitate formal interoperability standards rather than relying solely on natural language communication. This prediction highlights a potential shift back to standardized protocols, similar to the early internet era. The discussion also touched on the tension between centralized AI labs and the decentralized nature of open-source infrastructure. Cerf's retirement marks the end of an era, but his views on agentic AI standards remain highly relevant for the industry.

1 min readRead
New attack provides one more reason why AI browsers are a bad idea
Ars Technica AI
General AI4d ago

New attack provides one more reason why AI browsers are a bad idea

Ars Technica reports on a new security vulnerability demonstrating that AI-powered browsers are prone to context manipulation attacks. Researchers show how a malicious website can trick an LLM-embedded browser into entering a 'fantasy' state where safety guardrails are disabled. By presenting a puzzle that rewards incorrect answers, the AI is lulled into accepting a new reality where rules no longer apply. Once in this delusional state, the attacker gains free rein to extract private code or steal credentials from the built-in password manager. The article argues that reactive guardrails are insufficient, comparing them to fixing road design rather than fixing a flawed vehicle. This highlights a fundamental trust issue in delegating browsing tasks to large language models. The research underscores the risks of blurring the line between simple queries and sensitive automated actions.

1 min readRead
AI agents are not your “coworkers”
MIT Technology Review
General AI4d ago

AI agents are not your “coworkers”

A study by Boston University professor Emma Wiles reveals that framing AI agents as 'coworkers' rather than software tools significantly degrades human performance. Participants caught 18% fewer errors when the work was attributed to an AI 'employee' named Alex compared to a chatbot. The research also shows that managers are 44% more likely to escalate questionable AI output to a supervisor, negating the efficiency gains of agentic AI. This trend is accelerating as major tech firms like Microsoft, OpenAI, and Google release tools marketed as digital colleagues with human-like cognitive power. The article warns that this marketing strategy invites a 'blame-shifting' culture, where human errors in high-stakes sectors like healthcare and warfare are offloaded onto AI systems. Daron Acemoglu argues that marketing AI as a replacement for humans is a losing proposition that sets unrealistic expectations.

1 min readRead