
AI agents are not your “coworkers”
A study by Boston University professor Emma Wiles reveals that framing AI agents as 'coworkers' rather than software tools significantly degrades human performance.
Participants caught 18% fewer errors when the work was attributed to an AI 'employee' named Alex compared to a chatbot.
The research also shows that managers are 44% more likely to escalate questionable AI output to a supervisor, negating the efficiency gains of agentic AI.
This trend is accelerating as major tech firms like Microsoft, OpenAI, and Google release tools marketed as digital colleagues with human-like cognitive power.
The article warns that this marketing strategy invites a 'blame-shifting' culture, where human errors in high-stakes sectors like healthcare and warfare are offloaded onto AI systems.
Daron Acemoglu argues that marketing AI as a replacement for humans is a losing proposition that sets unrealistic expectations.

